Industry:Manufacturer of industrial equipment and machinery
Department:Production engineering division

Plans to Ramp Up Production Face Setbacks due to Bottlenecks in the Manufacturing Process

A bold proposal from a machine tool manufacturer was the key to speeding up machining and improving accuracy.

Background

The manufacturer featured in this case study produces industrial equipment. In response to demand for more rapid automation of factories and worksites, the manufacturer had decided to increase production of components used in automation applications. But when the manufacturer performed a review of its processes in the hope of significantly boosting productivity, it found that one process was creating bottlenecks.

Problem

Slow Finishing Process and Inconsistent Bore Diameters Stymy Plans to Boost Production

The bottleneck was caused by a process performed at the machining center to finish internal bores after fine boring. The chief engineer of the production engineering team who was asked to propose and implement a plan to boost production recalls:

“Finishing of internal bores was performed at the machining center, taking an average of 120 minutes per set of workpieces. In the interests of accuracy, we machine multiple components as one in a stack, but the large number of bores made it necessary to reposition holders during machining. We were expending a significant amount of time on this task.”

Because final finishing was performed by a cutting process, wear on cutting heads caused inconsistencies in the bore diameters and surface roughness achieved after a given amount of cutting time. Any increase in production volume would made it necessary to replace cutting heads more frequently, each time stopping the production line and therefore creating significant downtime.

Deciding that speeding up the bore finishing process and ensuring consistent accuracy was key to improving productivity, the chief engineer discussed the matter with his team in the hopes of improving the process but struggled to find an effective solution.

Summary of the problem

  • It took 120 minutes to perform bore finishing on a single set of workpieces at the machining center.

  • The large number of bores made it necessary to reposition holders during machining.

  • Wear on cutting heads caused changes in bore diameter and surface roughness, leading to inconsistent precision.

  • Increases in production volume meant more frequent cutting head replacement and more downtime.

1 2